When you start training or resume after a break! you will progress! whatever
the demands you make. This progression will be more or less rapid Follow-up feedback depending on the volume of training! the method chosen!
each person’s predispositions and also the years of practice behind you… but once you
have reached a certain personal level! it will no longer work. You will have to structure your practice! calibrate your exercises! change your routines… etc. etc. to
get the last watts.
Last April! I explained the benefits of short vs. long intervals and the industry email list benefits of the famous 30/15 PMA exercise. The Follow-up feedback study was interesting because it analyzed experienced athletes and still showed improvements.
Study reminder: evolution of short IT power (SI) vs long LI
I now have some personal feedback from several athletes who followed this protocol after trying more classic workouts like the 30s @ PMA / 30s recovery interval.
Below I propose an analysis of the evolution of a follow-up
over a season by comparing CP 5 tests with
the support of the improvement in its performance after a cycle of PMA 30/30 and
40/20 then since mid-August a cycle of 30/15.
The follow-up began in early December with a PMA test at around 320 watts. This person was not
a beginner but had never tried a structured the mktg spain agency will develop the communication of the madrid training plan with
power.
This was followed by a classic preparation with
endurance! maximum strength! then
strength endurance before moving on to more qualitative cycles according to
personal objectives. In April! we carried out a PMA cycle with series
of 30/30 then 40/20 as can be seen below.
A new PMA test was carried out at the end of May after a period
of assimilation/recovery of the cycles. The test gave 340 watts. This is therefore a 20 watt increase
after 6 months of preparation. This is average! low certainly! but remember be numbers that in training
there are never predefined rules. Some will be lucky enough to progress
by 40 watts with the same program! or another program on
longer intervals could have given better results. It is up to the trainer to adjust his program based on the feedback he has with his monitoring in order to find what works or not.