we believe that interchange can be reduced in terms of products whatsapp number database and services. But we do not see a strict need for regulation. For example, in Europe, after interchange was regulated, the share of cash increased and people began to refuse cards because it became unprofitable for banks to offer them. We do not want to achieve such a result. We believe that cashless payments are much more profitable for both the state and the citizen.
Mir proposes to reduce interchange
fees for social goods and services, such as children’s goods and everyday items. But we hope that prices will also decrease for consumers. We must decide together with the departments how we will control this.
– What are the options?
—First of all, these are test purchases
price monitoring, and interaction with the FAS on the best interests of the child: a lawyer’s perspective on determining the child’s place of residence these issues. Overall, this should lead to lower prices for the consumer.
— Interchange currently amounts to 1.5-2% of the card america email turnover; if it were to decrease, we are talking about a percent or even tenths of a percent. Will the consumer notice such a price reduction?