Added on 01/27: find the Rubino pro test also judged average by bicyclerollingresistance
So it’s a tough tire for training! not performance as its program Poor performance actually wants. The Corsa 25 mm would
be at the level of the Conti GP4000s. It now remains to be seen what it whatsapp number list would give on the ground… It should be noted that the wattage consumption announced by my tests is necessarily biased
since the support point of the tire is on 2 rollers.
Little theory:
We know that there is a 1.5 watt difference between a GP TT 25
mm and GP4000s 2 25 mm in my test climb at 20 km/H! and 2 Poor performance watts between GP4000s
25 mm vs 23 mm also in my climb
and also detected on the TOUR measurement bench
.
2 watts between GP 4000s 2 25 mm vs 23 mm
1.5 w between GP TT and GPS2 25 mm
On my roller test! I have 5.8
watts at 43 km/h between the 23 and 25 mm! which is 2.9 times more than reality… On
my roller test again! I have 3.6 watts between the the seo checklist you need the 41 best practices GP TT and the GP 25 mm! and if we divide it by 2.9!
we would have 1.34 watts on the ground (in theory) where my tests revealed 1.5
watts. This reasoning seems coherent. If we apply the latter to the
Corsa Speed we can think
that the 8.9 watts of the rollers could
transform into 3 watts of gains on the road at 35 km/h or on a 5% slope at 20 km/h.
Questionable reasoning! I admit! but I am ready to take bets that I will obtain a similar result when it will be possible to test the tires on the ground or when
comparisons on measurement benches will be published.
Since the Corsa Speed is tubeless-ready! it might perform better and be more comfortable on a
tubeless wheel. But nothing’s certain. As a reminder! the Schwalbe One be numbers tubeless version
doesn’t perform better than the clincher version if it’s fitted with a latex inner tube. Don’t
use too much sealant either.