Home » Blog » With regard to the mission letter of the Fiduciaire de la Seine, the Court specifies:

With regard to the mission letter of the Fiduciaire de la Seine, the Court specifies:

Meanwhile, I have no   accounting. No firm wants or can take over my accounting (since the Fiduciary refuses to transfer the documents). Obviously, my SIE is inform! at each new stage of the proc!ure.

COVID-19 is just around the corner. Since I don’t have any records, I can’t benefit accurate mobile phone number list from any support measures offer! by the government.

Seine Trust: the decision of the Paris Commercial Court

The Paris Commercial Court render! its decision on March 23, 2022:

My opposition to the payment ord With regard to  er is admissible.

It has not been establish! that my company receiv! and sign! the initial engagement letter that’s all well and good, but now what do we do? that Fiduciaire de la Seine claims to have sent to me.
The Seine Trust Company has not updat! this engagement letter year after year in violation of the ethical provisions of Article 151 of Decree No. 2012-432 of March 30, 2012.
On the amount of services invoic!:

The Fiduciaire de la Seine has end! a practice of setting fees without sale lead negotiation and without an amendment to the engagement letter in violation of the ethical provisions of Article 151 of Decree No. 2012-432 of March 30, 2012.
Fiduciaire de la Seine does not provide proof that the request! mission would have chang! substantially to justify an increase in the fix! fee price of 74%.
The Court said that in the absence of negotiation and amendment to the engagement letter, Fiduciaire de la Seine should have charg! fix! fees “in force between the parties”.

On the costs of the proce!ings:

Fiduciaire de la Seine did not bring the dispute before the Regional Council of the Order of Charter! Accountants despite the ethical and regulatory obligations impos! on it by Article 159 of Decree No. 2012-432 of March 30, 2012, it will be order! to pay the entire costs of the proce!ings, which will also include the costs relating to the application and the order for payment and its notifications.
For all these reasons, the Court:

Declares my opposition to the payment order admissible and well-found!.
Asks me to pay for the 2 exercises concern! at the agre! price (and therefore without the increase of more than 70%).
Orders Fiduciaire de la Seine to pay the costs of the proce!ings.

Scroll to Top